Historians weighing in on 'unbalanced' 1619 Project

 

January 5, 2020



The reviews of the 1619 Project are in.

It is “a very unbalanced, one-sided account.” It is “wrong in so many ways.” It is “not only ahistorical,” but “actually anti-historical.” It is “a tendentious and partial reading of Americ...



For access to this article please sign in or subscribe.










 
 

Powered by ROAR Online Publication Software from Lions Light Corporation
© Copyright 2020