The Eastern New Mexico News - Serving Clovis, Portales and the Surrounding Communities

By Dan McKay Albuquerque Journal
Syndicated content 

Civil Rights Act closer to passage

 

Last updated 3/17/2021 at 12:35pm



SANTA FE — Legislation to establish a New Mexico Civil Rights Act — a proposal sparked by protests against racism and police misconduct — won approval in the state Senate early Wednesday, pushing it to the brink of final passage.

The measure passed the House a month ago, but senators revised the bill, so it will have to go back to the other chamber for agreement on the amendments.

It passed the Senate on a 26-15 vote about 10 minutes after midnight.

The legislation, House Bill 4, emerged quickly this year as one of the most fiercely debated measures of the session. City and county governments and law enforcement executives have opposed the proposal, arguing it would do little to prevent misconduct while exposing taxpayers to costly legal settlements.

Sen. Joseph Cervantes, a Las Cruces Democrat and co-sponsor of the bill, introduced a package of amendments during the debate intended to address some concerns expressed by opponents.

The changes would:

— Make it discretionary, not mandatory, for a court to award attorney fees to a prevailing plaintiff.

— Require the plaintiff to notify the government of a potential civil rights claim against law enforcement within a year of the incident.

— Allow people to bring claims only for incidents that happen after July 1 this year, not for anything that happened in past years.

The Senate adopted the amendments.

The heart of the proposed Civil Rights Act remained intact. It would allow lawsuits to be filed in state court to recover financial damages for violations of the New Mexico Bill of Rights.

Sen. Jacob Candelaria, an Albuquerque Democrat and attorney who handles civil rights litigation, said the proposal would be an important step toward helping victims of government wrongdoing. The legal deck is already stacked against people harmed by public agencies, he said.

"Our Constitution can promise anything it wants," Candelaria said, "but the promise of due process means nothing if there's no remedy. The promise of freedom of religion means nothing if there's no remedy."

Sen. William Sharer, R-Farmington, said the legislation could trigger an "endless pit of lawsuits."

The Legislature, he said, should heed the warnings of schools, cities and counties expressing fears about an influx of legal claims.

Lawmakers should focus instead, Sharer said, on protecting police officers and sheriff's deputies who put their lives at risk for the public.

"These are officers who just want to go home at the end of their shift and see their family," he said.

Cervantes, in turn, urged his colleagues "to reject some of the rhetoric tonight. The suggestion that this is us vs. the police is a diversion. It's a tactic to divide us."

The proposal includes a $2 million cap on damages for each individual involved in an incident that led to a claim.

Qualified immunity — a legal doctrine that makes it harder for plaintiffs to succeed — would be barred as a defense against claims under the act.

The bill is sponsored by Cervantes, House Speaker Brian Egolf of Santa Fe and Rep. Georgene Louis of Albuquerque, all Democrats.

Wednesday's vote was largely along party lines, with Democrats in favor and Republicans opposed.

Sen. George Muñoz of Gallup was the only Democrat to vote against the bill.

 
X
 

Powered by ROAR Online Publication Software from Lions Light Corporation
© Copyright 2020

Rendered 04/20/2021 20:10