McManigal: Government less honest thieves

What do you want badly enough you are willing to steal to acquire, and kill those who resist your theft?

link Kent McManigal

For some people it is a smart phone, a pair of expensive athletic shoes, money, or a car.

For others, it’s a fighter jet, a social net, public schools, safety, or something else they really want, but can’t personally afford. Or at least can’t afford in the only way they can imagine buying them.

Some apparently believe there’s a difference.

Perhaps there is a difference, after all.

Those in the first group, who are willing to steal shoes and phones, and kill those who resist, are generally willing to take all the risks themselves.

They rarely pretend to be committing their acts for anyone’s benefit but their own. They don’t pretend you owe them gratitude after they rob you.

They never point to an imaginary social contract as justification for their acts. They don’t generally claim your “contribution” needs to be repeated on a yearly basis. They often expect to face resistance, and don’t generally find much sympathy when they get shot for their efforts.

Of the two, they are the more honest thieves.

The other group, those who tax, claim to be acting out of generosity, or to be protecting you from someone worse — their most bizarre claim of all: they claim “authority” to take your property.

Yet, thieves they are; backing their theft with the threat of deadly force. If you refuse to comply, the taxers will continue to escalate the force they use until, at some point, unless you give in before then, they will send an armed gang to take you into custody to be caged, and kill you if you resist. Yet they claim taxation is voluntary.

I am by no means opposed to everything tax money is spent on. I am opposed to not giving people a real choice.

“Move to Somalia if you don’t like it,” doesn’t count as choice.

You can’t be generous with other people’s money, but only with your own. If you pretend to protect someone by doing anything they feel the need to be protected from, your claims are empty.

If you want something you can’t afford, invite others to join you in pooling resources to finance it. If you can’t get enough people to help you, consider it a clear message that what you want isn’t important to enough others, and move on with your life.

Or start trying to convince more people why they should want what you want, and to be willing to chip in to get it.

Anything less is hilariously hypocritical.

Farwell’s Kent McManigal champions liberty. Contact him at:

[email protected]