Serving Clovis, Portales and the Surrounding Communities

Violation can't justify more violation

In the aftermath of any mass shooting, it is disheartening to see well-meaning people express their outrage over innocent people being violated by immediately demanding politicians violate innocent people.

I understand feeling “something must be done,” but I can’t support any plan that violates people’s indispensable rights. The horror of someone violating people can’t justify violating more people.

No one has the right to murder, and very few gun owners commit murder. No one has the right to create anti-gun laws, yet every government does. It is wrong to violate people who have harmed no one. People clamor for more laws, even as the attempt is doomed to fail and will only make mass murders easier to commit.

Each and every person has an absolute human right to own and to carry any kind of weapon they see fit, everywhere they go, openly or concealed, without asking permission of anyone. This right can be respected or it can be violated. Rights aren’t subject to majority opinion, feelings of fear, or claims of necessity.

Rights don’t come from the Bill of Rights — abolish the amendment and the right remains unchanged.

Of all the unpopular rights, the right to free speech is probably the most dangerous when misused. If you disagree, you might want to take a closer look at history. Yet, no one has the authority to prohibit or place limits on speech, even if governments pretend they do. You will always have the absolute right to speak your mind regardless of any law.

Governments have no authority to limit any right; by doing so they only delegitimize themselves. Creating or enforcing anti-gun laws — commonly and incorrectly called gun control — is a serious crime; no better than committing a mass murder.

People who have no moral objection to murdering will happily ignore another anti-gun law. Imagining otherwise is a fantasy. Only people who have no intention to murder will be affected. The more anti-gun laws you make up and enforce, the more you empower murderers, and the more victims you serve up for their pleasure.

Author Robert A. Heinlein observed “An armed society is a polite society.” A related truth is that an unarmed society, where only the police, military, and freelance criminals remain armed, is not a society at all. It is a prison. A slaughterhouse.

I refuse to endanger you just to make myself or anyone else feel better. I will not appease bad guys of any sort. Not ever.

Farwell’s Kent McManigal champions liberty. Contact him at: [email protected]

 
 
Rendered 03/06/2024 06:48